Decided: August 01, 1997
Debra Underwood is attractive of a synopsis wisdom registered in support of Very first Franklin Financial Company (“Earliest Franklin”), Voyager Life insurance Team (“Voyager”), and Joe Seals, an employee out-of Very first Franklin. This situation try moved to it court from the ultimate courtroom, pursuant in order to § 12-2-7(6), Ala.Code 1975.
For the December 1992 plus in April 1993, Debra Underwood along with her partner, Jesse Underwood, lent funds from Basic Franklin. In the eventuality of a passing, the financing coverage do shell out completely your debt due to Basic Franklin.
Into the November 1993, the brand new Underwoods filed a voluntary petition having Chapter thirteen personal bankruptcy cover, listing within their petition specific costs, like the a couple financing having Earliest Franklin. Jesse Underwood died for the December 1994, just like the Underwoods were still into the bankruptcy. The fresh bankruptcy bundle was affirmed to your January eight, 1994.
2960235
Into the January 13, 1995, Ms. Underwood submitted a declare which have Very first Franklin to your borrowing lifestyle insurance coverage proceeds from the 2 Voyager policies. Towards the January twenty-six, 1995, Voyager awarded a few checks to Basic Franklin, purchasing positives throughout the quantity of $step one,808, getting used on Ms. Underwood’s funds with Earliest Economic. Ms. Underwood learned that both principles had paid off an amount much below the total amount who enjoys fulfilled the girl loan harmony that have Earliest Franklin. She telephoned Seals, a pal who was and additionally a worker away from Earliest Franklin, to ascertain as to why the credit life insurance proceeds failed to spend entirely her mortgage obligations which have First Franklin. Seals advised Ms. Underwood one she had been given most of the proceeds she is actually entitled to receive as the she along with her spouse had submitted having bankruptcy from inside the November 1993. Seals then endangered so you can repossess the girl vehicles, because borrowing from the bank coverage had not completely paid back the brand new finance.
Into the March twenty-two, 1995, Ms. Underwood recorded a loan application to own a hardship case of bankruptcy discharge, according to her partner’s dying. This lady application was supplied by bankruptcy proceeding courtroom towards April 17, 1995. This new bankruptcy proceeding trustee are released on twenty two, 1995, in addition to Section 13 continuing was signed.
To your January 2, 1996, Ms. Underwood filed this action facing Earliest Franklin, Voyager, and you can Seals, asserting says alleging swindle, infraction out of payday loans Hawaii offer, and you may bad trust, every relating to the gurus paid of the Voyager not as much as this lady insurance rates procedures. First Franklin, Voyager, and you will Seals went for a summary view, arguing the “doctrine regarding official estoppel” banned Ms. Underwood off seeking their says. This new demo courtroom supplied the newest motion and you will registered a view in choose of defendants.
A motion for summary view tends to be provided if there’s no legitimate dilemma of point truth while the swinging cluster are entitled to a view due to the fact an issue of laws. Hinkle v. Burgreen Contracting Co., 678 Thus.2d 797 (Ala.Civ.Application.1996). Should your swinging people can make a prima-facie demonstrating one zero genuine issue of thing facts can be obtained and that it is called so you can a wisdom once the a question of legislation, the burden shifts to the nonmovant commit forward that have research doing a bona-fide problem of issue fact. Id. So you’re able to beat an adequately supported realization view motion, the brand new nonmovant need to establish generous research starting a genuine problem of question truth. Id.
A debtor from inside the a case of bankruptcy need to divulge one legal actions likely to surface in a good nonbankruptcy framework. Luna v. Rule Lender off Middle Tennessee, Inc., 631 Thus.2d 917 (Ala.1993). The latest philosophy out of judicial estoppel pertains to preclude an event of if in case a position for the a legal proceeding inconsistent having a situation in earlier times asserted. Id. Therefore, the doctrine suppress a debtor who failed to divulge a claim within the a personal bankruptcy of asserting the fresh claim when you look at the a beneficial nonbankruptcy means.